Shell’s Negotiation Worksheet
Richard Shell in Bargaining for Advantage has a nice worksheet you can use to prepare for negotiating. (See below for a PDF version I created.) Walking through this, and writing out brief answers, can really calm you down and de-emotionalize a negotiation.
I would also suggest writing down the reasons for your asks, couching the asks as “I need ______ because _________.” Research shows that when you say “because,” people take your demands more seriously. The most interesting study on this concerned trying to butt into a line for a Xerox machine. A researcher approached a line and said, “I need to make copies. Can I cut in front of you?” Most said, “No.”
The same researcher approached another line and said, “I need to make copies because I’m in a hurry and have a presentation.” Many more agreed. It turns out the “reason” doesn’t even have to be very good: when the researcher said, “I need to cut into line and make copies because I need to make copies,” the subjects were just as likely to allow him to cut in as when there was a “good” reason. The explanation seems to be that we want to feel like we are acting for a reason—even if someone else provides that reason for us (i.e., “because”).
Anyhoo, here is the worksheet:
I. The Problem
- I must negotiate with [person] to [solve what problem?]
II. Goals and Decision Makers
- My specific, high expectations:
- My bottom line:
- Target-decision makers:
- Influencers (should I negotiate with these people first?):
III. Underlying Needs and Interests (shared, ancillary, conflicting)
- Mine:
- Theirs:
IV. Leverage
- If there is no deal, what do I lose?
- What steps or alternatives will reduce these losses?
- If there is no deal, what do they lose?
- Can I influence their alternatives to make their status quo worse?
- Leverage favors: Me? Other party? About even?
- Who has the most to lose overall from “no deal”?
V. Possible Proposals
- Build on shared interests?
- Bridge conflicting interests?
- Be creative?
VI. Authoritative Standards and Norms
- Mine:
- Theirs:
- My counter argument:
- Mine:
- Theirs:
- My counter argument:
VII. Third Party Moves
- Can I use a third party as leverage?
- As an excuse?
- As an audience?
- Coalition partner?
VIII. Situation Strategy and Analysis
- Situation as I see it is a:
- Transaction?
- Relationship?
- Balanced concerns?
- Tacit coordination?
- My basic style is:
- So, in this situation, I need to be more:
- Situation as they see it is:
- Transaction?
- Relationship?
- Balanced concerns?
- Tacit coordination?
- Their expected strategy:
- Competitive?
- Problem solving?
- Compromise?
- Avoiding?
- Accommodating?
IX. Best Modes of Communication
- Agent?
- Face-to-Face?
- Teleconference?
- Telephone?
- E-mail?
- Instant messaging?
X. Overall Positioning Theme
- A short statement that sums up our underlying purpose in this negotiation:
Update: Here’s a Cheat Sheet that I put together (PDF). Enjoy.
[...] 14, 2007 Posted by Gordon Firemark in Law. trackback Two Newtons blog has a good entry detailing Richard Shell’s Negotiating Worksheet. I [...]
On Negotiating - Recommended Reading « theatre and entertainment law
April 14, 2007 at 4:09 pm